586 Türkçe Sözcüğün İmgelenebilirlik, Tanıdıklık ve Öznel Edinim Yaşı Norm Degerleri

Semra Selvi Balo İlknur Maviş Aylin Müge Tunçer

Özet

Amaç: Gösterilen bir nesne veya eylem resmini adlandırmak bazı temel bilişsel süreçleri gerektirir. Bu süreçler, resim ve sözcüklere ait görsel karmaşıklık, imgelenebilirlik, imgelem uyumu, sözcük sıklığı, tanıdıklık, ad uyumu ve edinim yaşı gibi psikodilbilimsel özelliklerden etkilenebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sözcüklere ait psikodilbilimsel değişkenlerden imgelenebilirlik, tanıdıklık ve öznel edinim yaşına yönelik 586 Türkçe sözcük için normatif verilerden oluşan psikodilbilimsel veritabanı sağlamaktır. Yöntem: İki yüz altı katılımcı 586 sözcüğün imgelenebilirlik, tanıdıklık/aşinalık, öznel edinim yaşı değerlerinin belirlenmesinde yer almıştır. Elde edilen veriler ışığında sözcüklerin imgelenebilirlik, tanıdıklık, öznel edinim yaşı değerleri belirlenmiş ve bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler Spearman sıra korelasyon testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Yapılan analizler sonucunda 586 isim ve eylemin ortalama imgelenebilirlik, tanıdıklık/aşinalık, öznel edinim yaşı değerleri belirlenmiştir. İmgelenebilirlik değeri arttıkça, tanıdıklık değerinin de arttığı; diğer taraftan edinim yaşı arttığında hem imgelenebilirlik hem de tanıdıklık değerlerinin azaldığı görülmüştür. Sonuç: Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, daha erken edinilen sözcüklerin, zihinde daha kolay imgelemler yarattığını ve bu sözcüklerin daha geç öğrenilen sözcüklerden daha tanıdık olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma ile elde edilen veriler dil ve konuşma terapistlerine, dilbilimcilere ve ilgili alanda çalışan araştırmacılara önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

imgelenebilirlik, tanıdıklık, öznel edinim yaşı, psikodilbilimsel veritabanı, norm

Referanslar

Acar, E. A., Zeyrek, D., Kurfalı, M., ve Bozşahin, C. (2016). A Turkish database for psycholinguistic studies based on frequency, age of acquisition, and imageability. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'16).

Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Koltuksuz, A., Sezer, T., Mersinli, Ü., Demirhan, U. U., Yılmazer, H., Atasoy, G., Öz, S., Yıldız, İ., ve Kurtoğlu, Ö. (2012). Construction of the Turkish National Corpus (TNC). Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12).

Alario, F. X. & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 31(3), 531-552.

Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., ve Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, 36(1), 140-155.

Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., ve Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578-602.

Álvarez, B. & Cuetos, F. (2007). Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 377-383.

Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., ve Ellis A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(3), 560-585.

Bastiaanse, R., Wieling, M., ve Wolthuis, N. (2015). The role of frequency in the retrieval of nouns and verbs in aphasia. Aphasiology. 11, 1221-1239.

Bird, H., Franklin, S., ve Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, 33(1), 73-79.

Blomberg, F. & Öberg, C. (2015). Swedish and English word ratings of imageability, familiarity and age of acquisition are highly correlated. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 38(3), 351-364.

Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., ve Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 89–114.

Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Meot, A., ve Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, 35(1), 158-167.

Boukadi, M., Zouaidi, C., ve Wilson, M. A. (2016). Norms for name agreement, familiarity, objective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 585-599. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0602-3

Brysbaert, M. & Ellis, A.W. (2016). Aphasia and age of acquisition: are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology, 11, 1240-1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439

Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Meot, A., Boyer, B., ve Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 209-245.

Cortese, M. J. & Schock, J. (2013). Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 946–972.

Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., ve Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 650–658.

Cuetos, F., Samartino, T., ve Ellis, A. W. (2012). Age acquisition norms from elderly Spanish people: characteristics and the prediction of word recognition performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Psicológica, 33, 59-76.

Çiçek, M. (2015). A comparison of the word sets in the European Language Portfolio and the words in teaching Turkish as a foreign language textbooks: The case of Yunus Emre Institute Turkish Instruction Set A1 Textbook. International Journal of Language Academy, 3(2), 216-231.

Dell'Acqua, R., Lotto, L., ve Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32(4), 588-615.

Eken, N. T. (2015). Anlatı metinlerinde sözcük birliktelikleri: Türkçe üzerine eğitim-öğretim ortamları hedefli gözlemler. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi.

Ellis, A. W. & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 515–523.

Feyereisen, P., Van der Borght, F., ve Seron, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A re-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 26(3), 401-415.

Gilhooly, K. J. & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395-427.

Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105.

Hirsh, K. W. & Funnell, E. (1995). Those old, familiar things: Age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 23–32.

Kremin, H., Hamerel, M., Dordain, M., De Wilde, M., ve Perrier, D. (2000). Age of acquisition and name agreement as predictors of mean response latencies in picture naming of French adults. Brain and Cognition, 43(1-3), 286-91.

Kremin, H., Perrier, D., De Wilde, M., Dordain, M., Le Bayon, A., Gatignol, P., Rabine, C., Corbineau, M., Lehoux, E., ve Arabia, C. (2001). Factors predicting success in picture naming in Alzheimer’s disease and primary progressive aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 46, 180–183.

Khwaileh, T., Mustafawi, E., Howard, D., ve Herbert, R. (2019). Imageability, familiarity, and age of acquisition ratings for Arabic abstract nouns, abstract verbs and adjectives. The Mental Lexicon, 13(3), 354-387.

Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A. ve Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-38.

Maviş, İ. (2008). The regression hyothesis revisited: Evidence from Turkish. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22(10), 783-794.

Maviş, İ., Tunçer, A. M., Selvi-Balo, S., Tokaç, S. D., ve Özdemir, Ş. (2020). Kapsamlı Afazi Testi’nin (KAT) Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Diğer Değerlendirme Araçlarının (T-İAT ve T-RAT) Geliştirilmesi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi, Proje No: 1509S632.

Monaghan, P., ve Ellis, A. W. (2010). Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 506–525.

Montefinese, M., Vinson, D., Vigliocco, G., ve Ambrosini, E. (2019). Italian age of acquisition norms for a large eet of words (ItAoA). Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278

Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., ve Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(3), 528-559.

Paivio, A., CLark, J. M., Digdon, N., ve Bons, T. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory and Cognition, 17(2), 163-174.

Plaut, D. C., ve Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.

Pompeia, S., Miranda, M. C., ve Bueno, O. F. A. (2001). A set of 400 pictures standardised for Portuguese. Arquivos de Neuro-psiquiatria, 59(2B), 330-337.

Raman, I., Raman, E., ve Ertan, B. (2014). A standardized set of 260 pictures for Turkish: Norms of name and image agreement, age of acquisition, visual complexity, and conceptual familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 588-595.

Rofes, A., Zakariás, L., Ceder, K., Lind, M., Blom-Johansson, M., de Aguiar, V., Jovana Bjekić, J., Fyndanis, V., Gavarró, A., Simonsen, H. G., Sacristán, C. H., Kambanaros, M., Kraljević, J. K., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Mavis, İ., Orellana, C. M., Sör, İ., Lukács, A., Tunçer, A. M., … Howard, D. (2017). Imageability ratings across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1187-1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0

Sirois, M., Kremin, H., ve Cohen, H. (2006). Picture naming norms for Canadian French: Name agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 300-306.

Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Acheson, D. J., ve Meyer, A. S. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence that inhibition supports lexical selection in picture naming. Brain Research, 1586, 130-142.

Shao, Z. & Stiegert, J. (2015). Predictors of photo naming: Dutch norms for 327 photos. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 1-8.

Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174-215.

Snodgrass, J. G. & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 516-536.

Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 598-605.

Swinburn, K., Porter, G., ve Howard, D. (2005). Comprehensive aphasia test. Psychology Press.

Tsaparina, D., Bonin, P., ve Meot, A. (2011). Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1085-1099.

Tolgay, E. A. (2015). A Turkish database for psycholinguistic studies: A corpus based study on frequency, age of acquisition, and imageability. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Valente, A., Burki, A., ve Laganaro, M. (2014). ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: A trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 1–13.

Vitkovitch, M. & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 822 – 848.

ARŞİV

586 Türkçe Sözcüğün İmgelenebilirlik, Tanıdıklık ve Öznel Edinim Yaşı Norm Degerleri

geri dönmek için tıklayınız